Gossip and the Gray Area: Navigating Friendships and Boundaries between Students and Staff | Gonzalez

Abstract

This case study examines ethical leadership issues for both student leadership roles and university employees interacting closely with students, specifically looking at gossip and overstepping boundaries. Graduate students in Student Affairs graduate programs may struggle to name inappropriate behaviors or report them properly if they have not had to do so before or if they lack a role model or mentor to demonstrate how to hold peers and students accountable. This can be particularly difficult when the behaviors are not necessarily violations of policy but rather contribute to a negative environment or culture.

Primary Characters

Giovanna (she, her, hers, ella) – Giovanna is a first-year master’s student in the Student Affairs in Higher Education program. She is an out of state student, excited to work with the Center for Multicultural Engagement and specifically in advising multicultural student organizations for her Spring Practicum experience. She was a member of her undergraduate institution’s Association of Chicanx Activists (ACHa) and is eager to serve as the primary advisor to the organization as part of her practicum.

Anais (she, her, hers, ella) – Anais is a junior pursuing a degree in Behavioral Neuroscience with hopes of becoming a pediatrician in an underserved community much like the one she grew up in. She is one of three programmers in ACHa for the academic year and is passionate about community service and wellness.

Cameron (she, her, hers) – Cameron is the Assistant Director for Student Organizations within the Center for Multicultural Engagement. She was the graduate assistant for the center in the previous academic year before she was offered a full-time position.

Daniel (he, him, his) – Daniel is the Director of the Center for Multicultural Engagement and both Cameron’s and Giovanna’s direct supervisor in their respective roles.

Keywords: student organizations, student leaders, peer influence, advising

Context and Case

Institutional Context

Sagewood University is a medium-sized private, liberal arts university in the Southwest region of the United States. Throughout SU’s history 16-20% of its undergraduate students identify as Hispanic or Latino, and Latino/a/x students have built strong networks within the institution as well as enduring identity-based student organizations. Other minority groups have also formed respective student organizations though their overall number of students participating in these groups are consistently low. SU’s Center for Multicultural Engagement has been a steady supporter of these student organizations as well as a respected and well-known office on campus.

Case

Giovanna is a month into the spring semester of her first year in the Student Affairs and Higher Education master’s program at Sagewood University and feeling positive about her practicum site. She was initially hesitant to work in the Center for Multicultural Engagement as an advisor to the Association of Chicanx Activists (ACHa) and program coordinator for Sexual Assault Awareness Month in April in collaboration with the university’s Women’s Center. As a former ACHista (member of ACHa) at her undergraduate institution, she was nervous to sell herself short by potentially repeating an experience she had as an undergraduate. Those fears quickly subsided as she met executive board members and learned about the various issues they advocated for. She enjoyed attending body meetings and looked forward to one on one’s with each executive board member.

Today, Giovanna meets with Anais, one of three programmers in ACHa. Anais’ passion area is health and wellness, and she enjoys incorporating that lens into ACHa’s activism and community service. With Sexual Assault Awareness month on the horizon in April, the e-board unanimously voted for Anais to lead programming efforts and speak on behalf of ACHa at any public events. ACHa participates in annual programs such as relationship skill building workshops, Take Back the Night march, and Denim Day among other campus-wide events in collaboration with the campus’ Women’s Center.

Anais’ big task now is to present ACHa’s efforts at the next Multicultural Commons Coalition meeting and encourage peers to participate. The coalition meeting includes executive board members and regular members from the campus’ Black Students Union, Asian Students Association, Movimiento Estudiantil Chicanx de Aztlán (MEChA), and International Students Organization.

When Giovanna mentions the coalition meeting and asks if Anais has thought about what she would like to say, Anais grows quiet and looks down at her feet. Giovanna lets Anais know that its normal to be nervous and they can work on her remarks together if she’d like. “It’s not that,” Anais says. Giovanna is uncertain about what to say next; she has never seen Anais like this and is concerned. Anais says, “I don’t want this to change how you see me, but I was sexually assaulted in my freshman year. I went through the Title IX process, and nothing really happened, and I’ve gone to counseling for this so I’m better now, but I just don’t know if I can handle being the face of all our Sexual Assault Awareness events.” Anais continues to share how she wants to be a team player and support her peers, especially since they believe in her so much, but she is unsure if she can handle being immersed in the topic from here until May.

Giovanna asks if Anais has shared this with any of the ACHa executive board members; she’s seen their dynamic and believes that if they knew, they would understand and ask someone else to lead. Tears welling up, Anais shares, “I want to, but I just don’t think I can. We’re all friends but everyone always gossips and shares each other’s business with everyone, especially in the coalition.” Anais continues, “I even feel weird right now because I’m talking to you about this and not Cameron. But she also talks a lot with the e-board members about people’s lives and I don’t want them talking about me.” Giovanna feels heat coming to her face- she is struggling to imagine Cameron gossiping with students, especially as a new full-time employee.

Before leaving her one on one, Giovanna tells Anais that she will discuss this with her supervisor, Daniel, without letting Cameron or the executive board members know, to see if there are alternative ways for Anais to engage with the events without necessarily leading them. Giovanna knows Cameron has a good relationship with Daniel and the various executive boards as she had been the graduate assistant for the Center for Multicultural Engagement last year. Giovanna feels awkward approaching him with this topic and sharing Anais’ concerns about gossip. While she has not personally seen Cameron engage in gossip with students, Anais’ words and emotions feel too vulnerable to ignore.

Discussion Questions

  1. How might you have responded to Anais in this conversation? How would you navigate Anais’ concerns regarding a full-time staff member engaging in gossip with students?
  2. What responsibility does Giovanna have in this situation? What about Daniel?
  3. What follow-up (if any) should there be with Anais? With Cameron?
  4. What are Anais’ options in this situation? What coping strategies might she use to support herself, or seek support from Giovanna if she remains the lead for SAAM programming?

Author Bio

Alexa Gonzalez (she/her/ella) is a second-year student in Clemson’s Master’s of Student Affairs program and currently serves as a Graduate Community Director. Prior to coming to Clemson, Alexa graduated from the University of San Diego in 2021 and worked at San Diego Community College’s Dreamer Resource Center.

Because of How I Sound: Regional Dialects and Institutional Response | Farmer

Abstract

Boucher et al. (2013), along with Kinzler and DeJesus (2013), have shown negative perceptions toward those speaking with a variation of the “Southern” accent, even when saying the same thing as a more “Neutral” speaker. This case follows a first-generation college student from the southeast, now in a different region of the U.S., who experiences just that. Other students, staff, and faculty respond consciously or subconsciously to this situation in different ways, while the student finds solace in others with similar struggles.

Keywords/Phrases

First-generation college student, dialect discrimination, institutional intelligence model, sociocultural theory

Primary Characters

Riley Miller—First-year student, Howell University (he/him/his). Riley is a first-generation college student from a rural area of the Southeast. Coming from a blue-collar background, Riley’s father works in a large factory that gins cotton during the week and operates a sawmill part-time. His mother worked at the local grocery store as a cashier and is now unable to work physically. The Millers raised four kids in a small, run down trailer.

Riley is the only one of his siblings to go to college—he was chosen for a new scholarship that Howell is offering to those from economically disadvantaged areas. Riley’s academic performance was above average, which was quite the feat, considering he was still working a job himself and providing as best as he could for his family. Before travelling to the northeast to attend Howell, Riley had never been outside of his home state. While the scholarship is a full-ride, he had to work extra shifts at his landscaping job back home in order to afford to move his few items up to the university.

Sarah Rae Hoosier—Junior, Howell University (she/her/hers). Sarah Rae is a first-generation college student who grew up in an environment very similar to Riley’s. She was raised by her grandparents—h er father passed away from a drug overdose when she was an infant and her mother was incarcerated several years ago and is still in prison and has no contact with Sarah Rae. Sarah Rae was also an average student academically but attended Howell on a volleyball scholarship (this was the only scholarship she received). Without this scholarship to Howell, she would not have been able to go to college.

Dr. Johnathan Pratt—Chair (he/him/his).  Dr. Pratt grew up in an elite suburb in the northern Midwest. Now in his sixties, he serves as the Department Chair for economics at Howell, a position he has held for the past 10 years. Dr. Pratt is known for running a tight ship and having a singular focus on academics. If he’s not editing journals, or in his study which is a library of textbooks, he is teaching the economics core course, ECON 1000, which lays the foundation for students. He made sure when he took the Department Chair role that he retained this teaching appointment, as he wants a students’ first impression of higher education to be with him.

Callie Owens—Staff Conflict Manager, Howell University (she/her/hers). Callie is a young, energetic, and empathetic employee who started at Howell eight months ago. She grew up in, and obtained degrees from, the west coast. When Callie’s husband got a lucrative job in the area, Callie moved and recently started as the Staff Conflict Manager. She works with the campus Ombuds, human resources, and other key campus partners to assist with conflict resolution and mediation among staff.

Randolph Hamlin—Director of the Ombuds Office, Howell University (he/him/his). Mr. Hamlin has been assisting in Faculty and Student conflicts in the Ombuds Office at Howell for the last 23 years. Because he has had this position for so long, he has become increasingly lax in his duties. He is from the same town that Howell is in but has such a reputation for his longevity at the institution, some may say he has “Checked out.”

Institutional Context

Howell University is a private, research university in the Northeast. Howell’s has a reputation for academic excellence. The tuition is high, the GPAs are high, the snowfall is high, and the research dollars accumulated by faculty at Howell are also high. To graduate from Howell is very prestigious. Within the past several years, Howell has instituted a scholarship program at the undergraduate level, to assist in recruitment of students from disadvantaged areas and backgrounds. The general public has been wary of this effort, with social media comments saying that it was just to “Check a box” and that a few scholarships to students from a tough upbringing is a drop in the bucket to Howell’s expenditures and is just a way for administrators to say they’re “trying” to improve diversity (economically, demographically, etc.) at the university.

Case

Riley was nervous as he attended his first class, ECON 1000, at Howell University. He still couldn’t believe he was at a place like Howell. He thought back to hearing his name called for the scholarship during his senior year of high school. He blushed and walked up on stage, speechless. He knew he had performed well academically, and that Howell chose those with great potential from areas with little economic opportunity or mobility. But he had so many other responsibilities and worries in his life with his family, that he never dreamed something like this scholarship would be possible. He remembered his mom was so proud, she told everyone at Sunday School that week. But his dad didn’t really say much other than in his slow southern drawl, “Don’t get the big head with that award.”

Riley had kind of chuckled internally when he went to the cafeteria for breakfast that morning. He thought fondly back to breakfasts that “Mama” cooked. Grits, homemade sausage gravy, biscuits, and Riley’s favorite—the “Fried ‘taters.” But breakfast at Howell wasn’t the same. Fruit trays, bran muffins, a custom yogurt station. It was good, but wasn’t what Riley was used to.

As he sat in class, toes tapping with nervousness, Dr. Johnathan Pratt walked in sporting a white beard and a thick wool blazer. Riley thought to himself that he needed to get some thick wool clothes – It wasn’t this cool in September where he was from. Dr. Pratt announced to the class of fifteen, his name, accomplishments, and reputation. He did so in a way that was poetic, fancy, and embellished. He then asked the class if they would introduce themselves, giving their name, background, and what brought them to Howell.

Riley marveled as he heard his classmates introduce themselves. The students were from all over the country, and the world. Oregon. New York. Canada. China. Indonesia. Belgium. Riley’s toe-tapping got faster the closer they got to him. He thought internally that he had nothing that would match up with these students. They had perfect 4.0’s. Travelled globally. Liked English literature, the ballet, playing the saxophone. Even the way they spoke matched Dr. Pratt’s tone and style. Finally, it was Riley’s turn.

Riley knew he had inherited a drawl from his father and mother. Where he was from, you were looked at oddly if you didn’t speak that way. Even so, Riley did his best to hide that as he scrambled to think of something and cautiously uttered:

Hey y’all, I mean…ever-body…uh, hi everyone. Um, my name is Riley Miller, and I’m from a purty sma—I mean um a little town, a place, down south. I ain’t…I don’t, I mean, got any big umm stories to tell…we didn’t have much to do ‘cept work. On Sund-ee (clears throat)…Sun-day….we’d all go eat dinner at mamaw’s…uh granny’s…um um my grandmother’s house, and so that was fun. But yeah, I’m tickled…um, happy I mean…to be here.

Riley could see everyone in the class cringing as he let out a final statement to try and save it with humor, “And my diddy…my father… told me to learn summ’n. So, I’m here to learn summ’n.” That comment didn’t save his introduction. The class looked at Riley as if he had three heads.

Dr. Pratt mumbled under his breath (loud enough for the entire class to hear) that he knew who wouldn’t be presenting during group projects. The class laughed. He then interjected to the class that they should address this body with professionalism. He reiterated that it was no place for colloquialisms or backwards speech. This was a place of higher learning, and he expected everyone to carry themselves as such. He cajoled the class to speak a “Standard” and “Proper” way, and that to not do so would most certainly result in not living up to what Dr. Pratt called “The Howell Standard.”

Riley didn’t speak the rest of the class. For the next week, Riley shuffled into the class, sat in the back, and kept a low profile. He was so self-conscious; he became a recluse in his dorm. He didn’t want to speak for fear of being singled out and looked down upon. He didn’t want to venture out because he constantly compared his hand-me-downs to the expensive clothes of the other students. He didn’t ask questions in class, or look for clubs to join, or even call home to check on his family.

Two weeks in, he got up the courage to go back to the cafeteria. He choked down another bran muffin, and granola yogurt. A young woman sat down by herself a couple of seats away, on a phone call. He was surprised to hear a familiar twang in her voice as she talked with her earbuds in. This was the first time since Riley had moved to Howell that he had heard someone speak in a dialect similar to his. There was that drawl! Riley feared he had forgotten what a drawl was. After she hung up, Riley went to introduce himself.

The two hit it off immediately. Sarah Rae Hoosier was from the state next to his, and she too had roots that showed in her voice and way of life. They connected as if they were lifelong friends who had been reunited. Riley told her about feeling like a fish out of water, and what had happened in ECON 1000 with Dr. Pratt—saying that he felt discriminated against “Because of how I sound.” Sarah Rae encouraged Riley, saying that she had felt much the same when she came two years ago. But during this time, she became familiar with the works of James Gee, and Rosina Lippi-Green’s book English with an Accent. These works and others, grounded Sarah Rae in her own identity, and confirmed what she knew (and subsequently passed along to Riley) that their way of talking—while different than most around Howell—was as complex, unique, and deserving of respect as any other. She pointed out that the students from across the globe now at Howell spoke differently than Dr. Pratt and other professors—but because those ways of speaking didn’t necessarily have negative connotations like the way she and Riley spoke, those students were not reprimanded or stereotyped. Sarah Rae encouraged Riley to speak to a campus Ombudsperson about this incident and the way he was feeling.

Riley called and emailed the Ombuds but could never get a follow up or a meeting. Riley then reached out directly to the director of the office, Randolph Hamlin, on Hamlin’s individual email. He had reviewed Mr. Hamlin’s bio on a website and felt this situation—and lack of response—needed running up the ladder to him. Unfortunately, the result was the same. No response to emails. No calls back to Riley’s voicemail. When Riley would stop by, the door would be closed with a sign that said “Out.”

One day while checking at the Ombuds office and seeing Mr. Hamlin’s door closed again, Riley noticed a young woman sitting in an office on the other side of the hallway. At his wits end, he went in and introduced himself and asked if she knew when Mr. Hamlin would be back. She sighed and said she didn’t know either and apologized for the frustration. She introduced herself as Callie Owens, Staff Conflict Manager. Riley liked her personality and empathetic spirit. “Mind if I sit down?” he said, and she obliged. He began to pour his heart out to Callie, who listened intently. When he concluded, Riley mentioned that he knew she could not do anything because she was there to help staff with situations, and not students. Callie said that she would see what she could do—she was new too but wanted to help him. Riley went out the door with his head hung low, but at least at peace that he had shared it with someone.

Callie was appalled at the behavior of Dr. Pratt and felt it needed to be brought up to the Dean and maybe even the Chancellor. But this wasn’t her purview–It was Mr. Hamlin’s. He was supposed to work on student and faculty issues. Being new, she was afraid that reporting this would put her under the microscope, and worried that Mr. Hamlin—a man who had been there over two decades—would throw her under the bus for “Going above his head” on an issue that should be his, and that administration would not take her anonymous report seriously because it had to do with a legendary faculty member. Still, she empathized with Riley and felt he was being prejudiced against just because of the way he sounded. Callie wrestled with this internally for the next week, with no sign of Mr. Hamlin in his office.

 

Discussion Questions

  1. How should Callie balance wanting to help Riley while keeping in mind her new position at the university? What does her body language say about her initial feelings of the university that she has gathered in her short time there?
  2. What are things about the university that Callie needs to know and understand to help Riley and do her job effectively? How might she go about getting that information?
  3. How can both Riley and Callie—new in their student and staff roles at Howell respectively—find their place, implement change, and remain true to their ethics?
  4. What should the university’s response be to Dr. Pratt? What repercussions would be appropriate?
  5. What are other areas where Riley may be struggling at Howell? What other questions could he ask Sarah Rae in regard to how she overcame similar struggles? What other questions might Cassie ask Riley in order to provide him the best support?

References

Boucher, C. J., Hammock, G. S., McLaughlin, S. D., & Henry, K. N. (2013). Perceptions of Competency as a Function of Accent. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 18(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.24839/2164-8204.jn18.1.27

Gee, J. P. (2015). Social linguistics and literacies : ideology in discourses. Routledge.

Kinzler, K. D., & DeJesus, J. M. (2013). Northern = smart and Southern = nice: The development of accent attitudes in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(6), 1146–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.731695

Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an Accent. Routledge.

Author Bio

Jeremiah Farmer (he/him) is a PhD student in the Literacy, Language, and Culture program at Clemson University. In his full-time role, he works as a Student Services Manager for Clemson’s Department of Automotive Engineering. Motivated by his upbringing and love of storytelling, old traditions, and the agricultural lifestyle of times gone by, his intended research topic centers on biases against, and perceptions, of the “southern accent” (of which there are many variations), how that may lead to accent dilution or loss in certain geographical areas, and techniques and cultural shifts to preserve these old dialects specifically. Before working in higher education, Jeremiah spent over five years in the country music radio industry. He holds a Master of Human Resource Development (MHRD) from Clemson University, and a BS in Political Science from Appalachian State University.

Penny for your Thoughts: Student Emergency Funding in Action | Callahan

Abstract:

This case focuses on the Student Crisis Fund established at Queensborough State University during the COVID-19 pandemic and what its future looks like. Nora Bloom is the new Director of Student Care Outreach and served under the founder of the Fund (and former director), Joanna Serkis. A potential donor, Bruce Hadler, has reached out and offered a significant donation to the Fund to name it after Joanna, but has asked for Nora’s team to review their protocols to ensure funding is going to students with the greatest need. There is also a need to mitigate scandal as nearby Kingstown College’s student emergency fund is under intense scrutiny after recent student protests for alleged bias in their application process. Nora is charged with preparing a presentation for Mr. Hadler on how her team plans to move forward.

Keywords:

Student Care, Emergency Funds, Donor Relations

Primary Characters:

Joanna Serkis (she/her) – As the long-time Director of Student Care Outreach at QSU, Joanna recently retired in 2022 after 25 years at the institution. Joanna was a key staff member behind the creation and facilitation of the Student Crisis Fund.

Nora Bloom (she/her) – Nora is the new Director of Student Care Outreach at QSU. Nora previously served as the Associate Director for Student Care Outreach for five years under Joanna.

Bruce Hadler (he/him) – Bruce is an alumnus of QSU, Class of ’86 and the father of Kayla, a QSU, Class of ‘21 graduate. Bruce is a potential major donor to Student Crisis Fund.

Kayla Hadler (she/they) – Kayla is an alumna of QSU, Class of ’21 and the child of Bruce Hadler. Kayla worked closely with Joanna Serkis after being hospitalized due to COVID-19 during her junior year.

Context and Case:

Queensborough State University is a large, public institution located in the southeast United States. It is considered a metropolitan campus, nestled in the heart of the city, and located within a few blocks of the main tourist district. Queensborough is made up of 70% in-state students. 35% of students attending QSU self-identify as first-generation college students. Many QSU students work part time in the food and beverage industry or other tourism-driven work in order to make ends meet.

In the initial days of the COVID-19 pandemic, QSU students were significantly impacted by business closures and changing health and safety protocols. As social distancing became the expectation and restaurant dining areas closed, many students were let go from their jobs and then had to move home unexpectedly as QSU transitioned to online learning. Joanna Serkis, long-time Director of Student Care Outreach at QSU, received a number of phone calls and emails from concerned students and their families about how to navigate the unanticipated costs of relocating, sudden job loss, and often, compounded medical expenses from students who became ill from COVID-19.

Joanna, in collaboration with the Office of University Development, launched the Student Crisis Fund and facilitated a hugely successful fundraising campaign. In the first four months of the Fund’s creation, QSU was able to raise and then distribute over $150,000 to students in dire financial need due to the pandemic. This initiative mirrored work being carried out at peer and aspirant institutions at the time, and Joanna capitalized on the knowledge of colleagues at other universities in the state to make the early days of the Fund a success.

In 2022, Joanna retired from QSU after 25 years at the institution. After a rigorous search process, Nora Bloom was selected as the next Director of Student Care Outreach. Nora had served as the Associate Director for Student Care Outreach under Joanna for the previous five years. Nora has had a successful transition into the role over the past year but has also been navigating a concurrent reorganization of the Division of Student Affairs at QSU in addition to taking on this new role.

One of QSU’s peer institutions, Kingstown College (KC), is located a few hours away in the same state. Kingstown is a mid-sized, public institution with student demographics similar to those at QSU. The Student Crisis Fund at Kingstown – Kingstown Cares – has existed for almost 15 years. However, it recently gained some notoriety when the student newspaper published an article accusing the crisis fund of bias and disproportionately allocating funds to white students. As a result, Kingstown has been experiencing student protests outside of their administration buildings, calling for greater transparency in student support services, including Kingstown Cares, and a comprehensive audit of how to mitigate bias in supporting students at KC.

Nora received an email from the Office of University Development this week. Bruce Hadler, an alumnus of QSU ’86 and the father of a QSU ’21 graduate, is interested in providing a significant donation to QSU to name the Student Crisis Fund after Joanna Serkis. His child, Kayla, contracted COVID-19 in April 2020 and was hospitalized for several weeks while she recovered. Joanna Serkis was instrumental in supporting Kayla and the Hadlers through the rest of the semester and ensuring Kayla stayed on track to graduate on time the following spring. While Kayla did not need to apply for assistance through the Crisis Fund, the Hadlers are interested in honoring the work that Joanna did to support Kayla and many other QSU students during her tenure as Director.

Mr. Hadler is aware of the recent scandal at Kingstown and has asked to meet with Nora prior to finalizing his gift to QSU. Mr. Hadler would like Nora and her team to evaluate ways that the Student Crisis Fund application review process can be improved to ensure that funding goes to students with the greatest potential need. The Office of University Development has asked Nora to prepare a presentation for Mr. Hadler at the end of the month, prior to finalizing Mr. Hadler’s donation to QSU.

Nora is reviewing her notes from the launch of the Crisis Fund as well as their distribution data from the last three years. When the program was launched, the Crisis Fund application gathered basic contact information from students as well as asked questions related to how much funding the student were requesting, what it would be used for, what other entities the student had reached out to for support, and a summary from the student about their current financial circumstances. Applications were reviewed by the Student Care Outreach team to confirm that each requesting student was enrolled for the current semester. A team member would also request a summary of the requesting student’s financial aid package to confirm that Crisis Fund disbursements would not impact the student’s federal aid eligibility. This process has remained unchanged in the intervening years, although the pace of Crisis Fund applications has slowed significantly as students adjusted to the “new normal.” Beyond enrollment status and financial aid information, Nora’s team has not tracked any additional demographic data or added additional offices to the review process.

Nora has a staff meeting in two days where she is able to ask for her team’s help in gathering data and conducting benchmarking in advance of her presentation. She will develop an action plan with her team to identify goals for the presentation, gaps of knowledge that will require research, and a timeline for preparing the new protocols based on their research and the meeting with Mr. Hadler.

Discussion Questions:

  1. What are some of the key factors Nora should consider when preparing for her staff meeting? For her presentation to Mr. Hadler?
  2. What connections or areas of knowledge could Nora leverage? (e.g., other offices on campus, her professional network, etc.)
    1. How might a reorganization within Nora’s Division impact her team’s ability to collaborate with other offices?
  3. Should Nora address the differences between the QSU process and that at Kingstown in her meeting with Mr. Hatteberg?
  4. Are there other data points Nora’s team should be gathering in the application review process? For example:
    1. Can students to apply more than once? Is there a limit to the number of times they can apply for this fund?
    2. Does a student’s disciplinary or academic standing affect their eligibility for funds?
    3. Should students be asked to self-report certain demographic markers in their application? Should this data be gathered from their student profile within the campus’s enrollment management system? (Consider both, one, or neither of these options)
  5. How might this review of the Crisis Fund application process be used to acknowledge and potentially address historic systems of oppression (race, ethnicity, first gen status, national origin, gender, LGBTQIAA+) at QSU and in higher education more generally?

Author Bio

Molly Jean Callahan (she/her) serves as the Student Support Coordinator and Office Manager for the Office of the Dean of Students at the College of Charleston. She received her bachelor’s degree in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from the University of South Carolina and her master’s degree in Counselor Education (Student Affairs) from Clemson University. She is a proud first-generation college student and prioritizes service to the profession. She is a past president of the South Carolina College Personnel Association (SCCPA). Outside of work, she loves to read, spend time with her spouse, and try to keep her two cats out of trouble. She can be reached at [email protected].